top of page
ACRI

Police Deploy 'Hawk Eye' System for Tracking Drivers

First Petition


On January 28, 2021, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) and Privacy Israel filed a petition with the High Court of Justice challenging the police's use of the "Hawk Eye" surveillance system. This automated system tracks and records the movements of vehicles on Israel's roads by capturing license plate information and photographing passengers. The system creates a vast database of video and still images of vehicles and their occupants, enabling the police to monitor and analyze citizens' movements extensively.


The petitioners argue that the "Hawk Eye" system represents an invasive surveillance mechanism that grants the police access to sensitive private information, including real-time location data and historical movements of individuals. They contend that this practice, conducted without proper legal regulation, judicial oversight, or legislative authorization, infringes upon constitutional rights to privacy and liberty. They further assert that even with legal authorization, the system's impact on individual rights would fail the constitutional test of proportionality and should not be allowed in a democratic society.


During a court hearing on May 27, 2021, the High Court of Justice directed the state to draft a law regulating the "Hawk Eye" system and publish it for public comment within 45 days. The court emphasized that the system's operation violates privacy and cannot rely on the police's general powers. Despite earlier instructions to develop authorizing legislation, no progress had been made by that time.


On January 11, 2022, the court issued a conditional order requiring the police to justify their continued use of the "Hawk Eye" system without explicit legislative authorization within 90 days. Following a November 2, 2022 hearing, the court granted the state an extension to advance the legislative process, with an update required by March 2, 2023.


The petition was ultimately dismissed on March 6, 2024, after the Knesset passed an amendment to the Police Ordinance that formally authorized the use of surveillance systems like "Hawk Eye" for identifying and analyzing objects, such as license plates.


Second Petition

Following the initial petition, the Knesset enacted an amendment to the Police Ordinance to regulate the "Hawk Eye" system. According to the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), this new law is unconstitutional and imposes severe, disproportionate infringements on human rights. As a result, ACRI filed a new petition with the High Court of Justice on August 20, 2024, seeking to have the law annulled.


The petition details how the system egregiously violates the privacy rights of innocent citizens who are not suspected of any wrongdoing. It establishes a precedent-setting, extensive database of all vehicle movements, which is stored for future use and enables continuous monitoring of specific vehicles in real time. The law lacks clear restrictions on the number and types of police cameras that can be deployed, permits the storage of camera data for up to two years, and allows any police officer to access this information without a judicial order or external oversight. Additionally, the police have not disclosed the procedures for using the system.


The petition argues that these provisions result in a profound invasion of privacy and liberty, creating a chilling effect on other rights such as freedom of expression and assembly, as citizens are aware they may be under constant surveillance. The technology effectively grants the police a level of power akin to that of the Shin Bet, enabling them to gather extensive personal data on citizens, including their locations, connections, and activity patterns, effectively turning Israel into a surveillance state.


The petition also includes a request for an interim injunction to suspend the system's use, citing the lack of essential regulations needed for the law's implementation, which were not enacted within the required six-month period.


Following the petition and the request for an interim injunction, the National Security Committee convened to discuss the regulations that enable the operation of the Hawk Eye system, which were approved. Consequently, we asked to amend the petition, but the court decided to dismiss the petition and directed us to first go through the legal steps related to the regulations before submitting another petition.


HCJ 641/21 Association for Civil Rights in Israel v. Israel Police

Attorney: Anne Suciu, Avner Pinchuk


The petition, August 20, 2024 (Heb)

The ruling, November 14, 2024 (Heb)


bottom of page